Reconsider the award. Abiy Ahmed weaponises food.

Re: Our deep concerns about the recent award you have given to Abiy Ahmed

Dear FAO,

We write to express our deep concerns about the recent award you have given to Abiy Ahmed. This award undermines the credibility and integrity of your esteemed organisation. We seek clarification on the specific achievements that warranted such recognition, as there are troubling instances that raise questions about the appropriateness of this award.

1. Has FAO considered the reports indicating that Abiy Ahmed’s government was involved in the illegal sale of wheat donated by USAID, which was intended for the starving population?

2. Are the allegations by Human Rights organisations, providing evidence of Abiy Ahmed’s army using food as a weapon of war, taken into account in this decision?

3. Is FAO aware of the reports suggesting that the regime denied fertilisers to impoverished farmers in the Amhara region prior to the last rainy season?

4. Does FAO not hear of the claims that the regime’s army is intentionally burning crops and harvests in various areas of the Amhara region?

5. How does FAO respond to the distressing reports of people dying from starvation in both the Tigray and Amhara regions under Abiy Ahmed’s leadership?

6. Given the concerns raised about the accuracy of Ethiopia’s data, especially in light of allegations of inflated figures for political purposes like the reported planting of 32 billion trees, does FAO believe it is appropriate to reward accomplishments based on such inaccurate data?

It is evident that the decision to honor Abiy Ahmed raises serious questions on multiple fronts. We urge FAO to reconsider and provide a thorough explanation, as this award has caused confusion and eroded the trust we once had in an organisation we viewed as a crucial partner for development. Your prompt attention to this matter is essential for restoring faith in the principles and values that FAO represents.

Thank you.